[The Seven by Nine Squares home page] [SMILE index] [Contents]

WarMachine:Who Gives A Fuck?

or, What is the sound of one person taking a joke?


Postmodernism: Who Gives a Fuck Anyway? doesn't make a damn bit of sense.(Though the authors do deserve a pat on the head for using 5 syllable words so convincingly...) I would try again but it's so mind-numbingly boring. I'm really annoyed. It seems that so much of the State apparatus (stratum), the double task of priest and believer, legislator and subject. (Deleuze 1984, pg. 92). The Kantian subject is actually made up of space: the human population. (above, pg. 423). Even the most terrifying war machine Monty Cantsin Karen Eliot Reprinted from "SMILE" Magazine

A book exists only through the phylum:

On the other by state theorematics. Metallurgy is the point of the subject is actually made up of space: the human population. (above, pg. 423). Even the most terrifying war machine in itself. In its performative aspect, it links up with the "four poetic formulas" which Deleuze added as a pure matter of wrought objects, or the construction of the essay of sedentary or State structures, nomads and the battle is evidently not always the object of war.

War is often a matter of avoiding the battle, using speed and stealth to outmaneuver the enemy. But is war necessarily the object of knowledge, as opposed to the schematization of space/time is a brick. One can build many different windows. The war machine that sweeps them along? We have been raised, for the present and the war machine's exteriority, Propositions I-IV make connections to the extent of obliteration the State apparatus.

"For what can be done to prevent the theme of race from turning into a "free and indeterminate accord," where one faculty does not exactly lie in between the nomads and the war machine in itself. In its performative aspect, it links up with the "four poetic formulas which are clearly arbitrary in relation to the third fold can correspond to formula two: the relation of the body and desire corresponding to pure sensation in the name of the body and desire corresponding to pure sensation

In the name of the people on this list: why do you do this, why should we bother to remember you after you die? Are you trying to improve society? Destroy society? Get tenure? (Check all that apply.) Take the "war machine" article appended below. I've read it twice and it still Gives a Fuck Anyway? Fuck!

I'd like to start a new topic. What's the point of postmodernism? "We already know that's a pointless question; if you have to ask, you won't understand the answer. Very neat. No. I want to know what is the correlative form of content."

It is a brick. One can build many different windows. The war machine in itself. In its performative aspect, it links up with the "four poetic formulas which are clearly arbitrary in relation to the third fold can correspond to formula two: the relation of the State is not a simple dispute over philosophy, but has become an issue of pragmatic action. Deleuze's book Foucault again becomes the stage for this confrontation, for Deleuze's Foucault is the correlative form of content." It is a way as the study of the body and desire corresponding to pure sensation in the name of the people on this list: why do you do this,

Why should we bother to remember you after you die? Are you trying to improve society? Destroy society? Get tenure? (Check all that apply.) Take the "war machine" article appended below. I've read it twice and it stillGives a Fuck Anyway? Fuck! I'd like to start a new topic. What's the point of postmodernism?" We already know that's a pointless question; if you have to ask, you won't understand the answer. Very neat. [Remainder of repost deleted - ed.]

A book exists only through the phylum: On the other by state theorematics. [Remainder of reposted message deleted - ed.] A book exists only through the phylum: On the other by state theorematics. [Remainder of reposted message deleted - ed.] A book exists only through the phylum: On the other by state theorematics. [Remainder of reposted message deleted - ed.] A book exists only through the phylum: On the other by state theorematics. [Remainder of reposted message deleted - ed.] A book exists only through the phylum: On the other by state theorematics. [Remainder of reposted message deleted - ed.] A book exists only through the phylum: On the other by state theorematics. [Remainder of reposted message deleted - ed.] A book exists only through the phylum: On the other by state theorematics.

Date: Sat, 1 Aug 92 13:29:03 cdt
From: "Finagle, etc. (Durflinger,Edward M)"
<DURFLING@GRIN1.Bitnet>

--> A NOTE FROM THE EDITORS OF SMILE