|   | 
      
 
 
        
        |> Interview:Conrad 
        Schnitzler  
         
          
        an interview by Carlos M. Pozo 
             angbase 
        issue # 3, fall 1998 
         
         
        My first group, before KLUSTER was called GERÄUSCHE (=NOISES). If 
        lots of people make noises, it becomes an orchestra... If you do it alone 
        - for example the sound of a stone on linoleum - that's a solo-track. 
        If you play these sounds and record them onto different tracks, it becomes 
        a composition... Make horrible noises with instruments and microphones 
        and echo-machines. Just do it and produce as much noise as you want. If 
        you organize this noise it's not just pure chaos... it can grow into music. 
        (CONRAD SCHNITZLER "I hate titles" Sound Projector #2, UK, July, 
        1997) 
         
        Conrad Schnitzler is an artist and musician who has been organizing sounds 
        into musical works that have consistently blown minds all across the world 
        since the late sixties. 
        Saying that he was a precursor to the industrial explosion of the 70s, 
        the home-made electroacoustic and post-punk experiments of the 80s, and 
        the techno, electronica and post-whatever experiments of today is, beyond 
        being factually true, missing the point entirely. Schitzler has always 
        been playing with abstract electronics - it is the ebb and 
        flow of the music underground's interest in these sounds that periodically 
        overlaps with his oeuvre. When the current infatuation with electronics 
        fades away Schnitzler will still be soldiering on in his studio, responding 
        to whatever is current through collaborations and interviews, and not 
        necessarily awaiting the next rediscovery of his ground-breaking 
        works. 
         
        1. The Cassette (or now CD) Concerts - do you still perform these regularly? 
        Could you tell me the date and place of yout most recent performance and 
         
        describe what was involved in the performance and the audience reaction? 
        Do you get paid to perform or are these free shows? 
         
        The recent state of my cassette-recorder-concerts is that the last of 
        these concerts have been done by Ken Montgomery in the late 80's. Now 
        there are no cassette-recorder-concerts anymore, but CD-player-concerts. 
        In the "simple" form, there are four cassettes/tapes, CD's with 
        informations used, that are started at about the same time and in that 
        case the different volume of these single cassettes makes the mix. It 
        made a big difference, if Serge Leroy did these mixes, like on "Constellations" 
        or if I do this. I'm very democratic with these mixes: I give every cassette 
        the same chance in turning up the volume on the same level. Of course 
        these concerts can be done with a lot more single-track CD's, it depends 
        on the performers intention as well as the capacity of the mixing-desk. 
        It's no problem to work with 12 or 14 CD-players if you're used to it. 
        Often I did these 
        performances in connection with a kind of lightshow, with videos or effects. 
        But usually there's only the performer, his CD-players and the mixing-desk 
        on a nearly dark stage - nothing more. I'm not going to perform any of 
        these CD-player-concerts in the future, as I don't have the power for 
        this anymore. It's not only that you need your imagination to 
        perform these concerts, but especially that you have to travel with all 
        the equipment and all the other problems that there are, while touring. 
        Norbert Schilling is going to continue these CD-player-concerts for me. 
        He has done a concert recently in Berlin with 14 CD-players and I was 
        very satisfied with the result of it. Concerning the payment: I have been 
        paid for these concerts as well as I did concerts for free. 
       2. I'm always curious about how artists make a living - have you always 
        supported yourself through art activities? Do you own all your studio 
        equipment? 
      This question is surely the most existential question for an artist. 
        John Cage for example, did suffer for a long time from having only very 
        little money. Ok, that changed later, but he needed the support of friends 
        and other artists. Later, when he had money, he gave a lot of it back 
        in supporting artists that were in the same situation like he has been 
        some years before. If an artist earns money with his art immediately, 
        this is a 
        reason to be suspicious. If a lot of people like one kind of "merchandise", 
        then it's mostly very average or mainstream. And this is deadly for "the 
        art", as art should provoke or offer something new. For the artist 
        himself it's of course not bad, as everyone has the right to work as an 
        artist, but if "art" is only a reason to make money, than that's 
        bad. 
        On the other hand there's this statement "only a poor artist is a 
        good artist", which I rate nonsense. Of course it helps, if someone 
        paints huge pictures and he has a "fan" that buys one picture 
        every month - for 3000 Deutschmarks. I have done lots of jobs, which helped 
        me to make a living, but without the help of my wife, I wouldn't be able 
        to do music today; I wouldn't have my own small studio equipment, I'd 
        probably have nothing! And then there are others, that have got a lot 
        of money from their fathers or their mothers who support their children. 
        I would do the same with my children, if I'd have enough money. Normally 
        it should be possible for the artist, who creates something, to live from 
        his art, as well as for the label which sells and distributes his records. 
        But I don't need to tell you, how difficult this is... On the other side, 
        if I had made money with my music, I'm not sure, if I would do the kind 
        of music I do today, as the music I do has 
        always been music for a small audience. If you realize the fact, that 
        my records are bought by between 500 to 1500 people, than this is nothing 
        compared to the sales of well-known artists. But this should keep no one 
        from doing his kind of art; it's no shame to go to work, if you can't 
        live from your art. To mention only two names: think of Franz Kafka, who 
        had a normal dayjob; or Vincent van Gogh - he didn't sell one single painting 
        in his whole life. If his brother Theo hadn't supported him, he wouldn't 
        have been able to paint all these masterpieces, which are amongst the 
        most expensive artworks of the world today. Of course there are a lot 
        of artists supported by the government or by institutions, but that is 
        a too quiet pillow. It's not enough that an artist creates some nice art, 
        but an artist should create his own individual mythology - the way he 
        lives and the art he creates should be a unity and something unique. 
      3. There is a note in the Art Gallery CDs asking for classically trained 
        musicians to perform your works - has this resulted in any upcoming recorded 
        works? What would be the working process for having these musicians play 
        your pieces? 
      The original intention was not to perform any of my recorded works, but 
        work with classically trained musicians in a more spontaneous way. It 
        was planned to use single-track recordings, that included simple electronically 
        recorded sounds like a rattle of a chain, the sound of stones, scratching 
        on glass etc., as a soundsource for a trained musician, who should be 
        able to "translate" these sounds to play them on his instrument. 
        The musicians should use very light headphones that would give them the 
        informations to translate them for the use of their instrument, but also 
        to listen to the other instruments of the orchestra. Let's say we have 
        four players, each one stands in a corner of a room so that they can see 
        each other: a trumpetplayer, a violinist, a cellist and a percussionist. 
        So all of the players get the electronic sounds from their headphones, 
        they hear their own translation of these sounds and how the other players 
        translate these sounds. An alternative would be, to record only the single 
        sounds of each instrumentalist and mix the results later. Of course a 
        live erformance would be much more interesting, as there's much more spontaneity. 
        Before the Berlin wall fell, it was extremely cheap to rent a complete 
        orchestra for a day, so even I would have been able to rent an orchestra. 
        But I didn't expected the Berlin wall fell that soon, so I didn't continued 
        this work, when I realized that I would never been able to pay for the 
        orchestra, as after the fall of the wall the price for such an orchestra 
        went up rapidly. I had the idea to let the orchestra do for about 30 minutes 
        only the sounds they make before they start to perform a composition. 
        This would be like a warm up for the second part of the concert, where 
        each player would get a short but detailled instruction what to play, 
        but should have enough space for his own ideas and the correspondence 
        with the other musicians. After I had given every musician his instruction, 
        I would conduct the volume and the dynamics of the orchestra - this has 
        always been a dream of me from my early childhood on. No matter if you 
        like Karajan or not, but if you ever had the chance to see and hear him 
        conduct an orchestra, where all had something to do at the same time, 
        and how he managed to conduct this orchestra from the finest pianissimo" 
        to the loudest "forte" that it sounded like a fade-in or a fade-out 
        as done on an electronic mixing-desk, that was something very fascinating 
        to me. 
      4. So far, you've employed every type of musical language imaginable, 
        from cassettes to synthesizers, to classical instruments and computers 
        - is there anything you have not done that you are looking forward to 
        doing (musically and non-musically)? 
      This is surely the most difficult question to answer. Of course, there 
        are always plans or imaginations, no matter if they're gigantic or very 
        simple. Personally I can only dream of those things that are feasible. 
        But of course I could imagine the following concert: we dig a big pit, 
        but I feel it has to be a very big pit, and into this pit we would throw 
        
        all arms of this world - and the sound, the sound of this action would 
        be my final concert - the rattle of the arms that are thrown into this 
        pit. This would probably be a gigantic, big concert. Apart from that I've 
        become very modest, I don't have any big wishes; time is running away, 
        so I'm glad I've time enough to do the small things of life, means to 
        get up, drink coffee and do my things, to have still a few hours left 
        to work on new compositions. To be true: I don't have big dreams anymore. 
        You wake up one morning out of your dreams and say, ok, let's start, and 
        you start to work and if it works the way I want, I'm satisfied. I don't 
        have any wishes, except to stay healthy. I have enough to do, so I don't 
        think that I'll get bored.  
        © Carlos M. Pozo | 1998  
         
       
       
       
        
           
            | D>Elektro  
              |2.1|    | 
           
           
            |   
                   |> Material | Presse | Interviews <|  | 
           
         
      
 | 
  |